Employers Regain the Right to Restrict Employee Use of Company Email Systems

Can your employees use your company email systems to communicate with other employees for the purposes of organizing a union in your shop?

That important question was decided by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in late June.

Their answer?

No.

This latest decision, involving T-Mobile USA, follows a December 2019 decision called Caesar’s Entertainment, in which NLRB decided employers do not violate the National Labor Relations Act by restricting the nonbusiness use of its IT resources unless employees can prove such systems were the only means for employees to contact each other.

Expanding on the December decision in the T-Mobile case, NLRB ruled that employer email systems are the property of the employer.  As such, employers have the legal right to restrict the use of those email systems, provided other means of communicating are available to employees.  The latest decision even covers organizing activities protected under Section 7 of the NLRA.

Going forward, the difficult burden to prove there are no other means of communication in such matters will clearly fall on unions and their employee supporters.

This new standard, restricting employee use of internal company IT systems (including email), applies retroactively to any pending cases disputing rules limiting the use of IT resources for purposes unrelated to work tasks.

What should employers do in the meantime?

Many legal experts are suggesting that employers review their employee handbooks to ensure that any limits on employee use of internal email systems are clearly defined and justified.

If you’re an employer and have questions about labor and employment law, consider calling on the attorneys at Kainen, Escalera & McHale in Connecticut.  We do one thing and one thing only – we are exclusively an employer defense law firm – in fact, we are one of the largest employer defense law firms in the region.  What’s more, each of our attorneys has over 25 years of experience in employment law and labor law matters and can provide your business with comprehensive legal counsel ranging from assistance with necessary preventive measures to trial advocacy.  Please contact us if we can help you.

 

 

 

The information provided above is made available by Kainen, Escalera & McHale, P.C. for educational purposes only.  It is not intended to provide specific legal advice to your individual circumstances or legal questions. You acknowledge that neither your reading of, nor posting on, this site establishes an attorney-client relationship between you and our law firm, or any of our attorneys. This information should not be used as a substitute for seeking competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state nor is it provided for the specific purpose of soliciting your business on any particular matter. Readers of this information should not act upon anything communicated in it without seeking professional counsel.

Share

Recent Posts

Kainen, Escalera & McHale Attorneys Again Recognized by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®

We are pleased to announce that our law firm, Kainen, Escalera & McHale has again…

4 years ago

Employer Alert – Time to Prepare for New Paid Family and Medical Leave Act

In 2019, the State of Connecticut enacted the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act (PFMLA), a…

4 years ago

Governor Lamont’s Actions on Workers Comp During COVID-19 Pandemic

Governor Ned Lamont recently issued Executive Order JJJ stating that employees who contracted COVID-19 in…

4 years ago

Important COVID-19 Labor and Employment Law Updates

Governmental guidance for employers continues to evolve and change on a daily basis. Some recent developments…

4 years ago

U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Guidance for Employers on Remote Work

Even as many states reopen their local economies, many employers are continuing to allow employees…

4 years ago

Understanding the President’s Action on Payroll Taxes

In early August, the President announced he was signing a number of executive orders designed…

4 years ago