This spring, the Connecticut Legislature passed a bill that would vastly expand the pregnancy anti-discrimination statute in the state. Here is a Q&A with our attorneys examining the bill.
Q: State lawmakers recently passed a law expanding employment protections provided to pregnant women under the state’s anti-discrimination law. What does the new law entail?
A: This past legislative session was very quiet with respect to employment and labor law. The one bill that did pass is the bill we are discussing here and it represents a simple strengthening of an existing statute.
Here are the new provisions of the law. It is now also unlawful;
Q: The Connecticut Business and Industry Association submitted testimony arguing that both state and federal law (prior to this bill passing) already provided pregnant women protection from discrimination. Is the new law going to be an onerous mandate for employers? How does it differ from current state and federal law?
A: The new state law strikes a few older provisions and adds new ones. The prior law made it unlawful to:
These three provisions were replaced by the new provisions in the law (see prior response).
The protections that a pregnant woman enjoy under federal law shall remain unaffected by the strengthening of the state law, and do not materially differ from those contained in the revised state law. However, under federal law, it still remains unlawful for an employer to, among other things:
Q: The new law requires employers to make “reasonable accommodations” for pregnant women. What are “reasonable accommodations?”
A: In the House bill, “Reasonable accommodation” means, “but shall not be limited to, being permitted to sit while working, more frequent or longer breaks, periodic rest, assistance with manual labor, job restructuring, light duty assignments, modified work schedules, temporary transfers to less strenuous or hazardous work, time off to recover from childbirth or break time and appropriate facilities for expressing breast milk.”
Q: How often are employers targets of discrimination lawsuits from pregnant employees? What are the most common complaints? Have such lawsuits increased or decreased in frequency in recent years?
A: Employers in Connecticut remain subject to lawsuits by employees for multiple reasons, and pregnancy discrimination lawsuits continue to be a significant component of such lawsuits, particularly in conjunction with claims asserted in connection with interference for exercising the right to take family and medical leave or being retaliated against for taking family and medical leave under the state or federal family and medical leave laws. The most common complaint in a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit is that an employer has terminated an employee close in time to receiving notice that the employee is pregnant. While pregnancy discrimination lawsuits have remained steadily problematic for employers over recent years, we anticipate that the additional “reasonable accommodation” burdens now imposed under state law may lead to an uptick in complaints in the months ahead.
Q: Are employers required to notify employees about the new pregnancy law?
A: Employers must notify employees about the new pregnancy law in three ways. First, by January 28, 2018, all employers must post a copy of the following notice where other employment posters are posted (Pregnancy Disability Poster). In addition, a copy of this notice must be provided to all existing employees (one time only by January 28, 2018) and to all new employees upon their hire. This additional requirement can be accomplished by incorporating the notice as part of an employee handbook, or by providing an individual copy of the notice itself. Finally, a copy of this notice must be provided to any existing employee within 10 days after she notifies her employer of her pregnancy or conditions related to her pregnancy.
We are pleased to announce that our law firm, Kainen, Escalera & McHale has again…
In 2019, the State of Connecticut enacted the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act (PFMLA), a…
Governor Ned Lamont recently issued Executive Order JJJ stating that employees who contracted COVID-19 in…
Governmental guidance for employers continues to evolve and change on a daily basis. Some recent developments…
Even as many states reopen their local economies, many employers are continuing to allow employees…
In early August, the President announced he was signing a number of executive orders designed…