Under Connecticut law, marijuana may be legally used to treat a wide range of medical conditions including the following:
Regardless of an individual’s ability to legally use medical marijuana to treat these medical conditions, Connecticut employers are still permitted to outlaw the ingestion of marijuana at work (or in public places or in moving vehicles). In fact, Connecticut law does “not restrict an employer’s ability to prohibit the use of intoxicating substances during work hours or restrict an employer’s ability to discipline an employee for being under the influence of intoxicating substances during work hours.” As a result, an employer in Connecticut can still have a policy that restricts the use of marijuana to lawful use outside of the workplace that does not cause the employee to be under the influence in the workplace or during work hours.
But, an employer cannot otherwise penalize an employee from lawfully using marijuana for medical purposes, unless required by federal law or required to obtain federal funding (i.e., because the use of marijuana for medical purposes is not allowed under federal law, if an employer has a federal contract requiring certification that all employees are drug free, then an employer is permitted to comply with that requirement by, for example, refusing to hire an applicant who has tested positive for marijuana use, even if such applicant is using medical marijuana as permitted under Connecticut law).
So what are you as an employer, with a zero tolerance rule on drugs, to do if an employee with one of the medical conditions listed above tests positive for marijuana? After all, marijuana is still considered a Schedule I drug by the federal Controlled Substances Act – and is therefore illegal under federal law.
Some employees in this situation might seek protection from the Americans with Disabilities Act – but that act does not protect persons using so-called “illegal drugs”.
So now what? Your employee may still pursue a claim against you under the Connecticut Palliative Use of Marijuana law. This law prohibits non-federally funded employers from discriminating against employees who are “qualified patient(s)” under the act.
But wait. As an employer, you still have rights as an employer to prohibit the use of intoxicating substances in the workplace – right?
Confused?
One thing is clear. Employees using marijuana medically do receive a limited and defined degree of protected status under Connecticut law. To make sure you understand the rules, have a qualified employment law attorney review your current employee handbook and any provisions regarding the use of intoxicating substances to make sure you are protecting your rights and the rights of those who work for you.
Photo credit: Tha Goodiez / Foter / CC BY-NC-ND
The information provided above is made available by Kainen, Escalera & McHale, P.C. for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide specific legal advice to your individual circumstances or legal questions. You acknowledge that neither your reading of, nor posting on, this site establishes an attorney-client relationship between you and our law firm, or any of the attorneys in our firm. This information should not be used as a substitute for seeking competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state nor is it provided for the specific purpose of soliciting your business on any particular matter. Readers of this information should not act upon anything communicated in it without seeking professional counsel.
We are pleased to announce that our law firm, Kainen, Escalera & McHale has again…
In 2019, the State of Connecticut enacted the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act (PFMLA), a…
Governor Ned Lamont recently issued Executive Order JJJ stating that employees who contracted COVID-19 in…
Governmental guidance for employers continues to evolve and change on a daily basis. Some recent developments…
Even as many states reopen their local economies, many employers are continuing to allow employees…
In early August, the President announced he was signing a number of executive orders designed…